Skip to main content


On August 30, 2018, in Anonymous v. Anonymous, the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, First Judicial Department held, for the first time, that a plaintiff-relator had sufficiently alleged that the defendants had violated the New York False Claims Act by using a captive insurance company for the sole purpose of evading taxes. The tax evasion scheme was brought to light by a former employee who utilized the New York False Claims Act’s qui tam provision. A qui tam provision allows a private citizen to stand in the shoes of the government when bringing an action. This Comment argues that Anonymous is an example of how beneficial a tax qui tam provision can be in uncovering complex and clandestine tax avoidance schemes.


File nameDate UploadedVisibilityFile size
6 Sep 2022
187 kB



  • Subject
    • Courts

    • Insurance Law

    • Taxation

  • Journal title
    • Boston College Law Review

  • Volume
    • 61

  • Issue
    • 9

  • Pagination
    • E.Supp. II.-193

  • Date submitted

    6 September 2022