Skip to main content


State and local pension funds have billions of dollars invested in global markets, and often use these assets to pressure foreign nations to change their human rights policies. Social investing practices and other non-social investment decisions impacting foreign nations may be impermissible incursions into the federal government's exclusive power over foreign policy under the Dormant Foreign Affairs Power, an implied constitutional restriction on state activity. This Note argues that in this era of global markets, a blanket prohibition against criticism of foreign nations does not allow states to fulfill their investment obligations. This Note calls for a flexible test to determine the constitutionality of state action—a test that considers the federal government's need for uniformity in foreign policy with the need of state governments to be global economic actors.


File nameDate UploadedVisibilityFile size
6 Sep 2022
2.64 MB



  • Subject
    • Banking and Finance Law

    • Comparative and Foreign Law

  • Journal title
    • Boston College Law Review

  • Volume
    • 42

  • Issue
    • 1

  • Pagination
    • 123

  • Date submitted

    6 September 2022