Skip to main content
LIRA@BC Law

Abstract

In 2007, the Bureau of Land Management adopted a resource management plan that essentially made all public land within the Roan Plateau Planning Area available for leasing to private oil and gas entities. Environmental groups alleged that the BLM, in adopting the plan, failed to satisfy the National Environmental Policy Act’s procedural requirements. In Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Salazar, the district court held that the BLM violated NEPA by failing to adequately consider the plan’s cumulative air quality effects. On remand, the court did not offer the agency any instructions in curing the procedural deficiency. The court’s lack of guidance on remand is consistent with the Tenth Circuit’s refusal to equate NEPA’s procedural requirements with the production of hard data. This Comment argues that the Ninth Circuit’s application of NEPA better promotes the Act’s underlying policies of public awareness and informed decisionmaking without imposing an undue burden on federal agencies.

Files

File nameDate UploadedVisibilityFile size
9.pdf
7 Sep 2022
Public
238 kB

Metrics

Metadata

  • Subject
    • Administrative Law

    • Energy and Utilities Law

    • Land Use Law

    • Natural Resources Law

  • Journal title
    • Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review

  • Volume
    • 40

  • Issue
    • 2

  • Pagination
    • 553

  • Date submitted

    7 September 2022