Skip to main content
LIRA@BC Law

Abstract

An increasing number of consumer financial products have begun to come pre-packaged with binding individual arbitration agreements. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s rule forbidding these agreements sought to ensure that consumers damaged by their banks’ actions could have their day in court. When Congress chose to repeal the so called “Arbitration Rule” in 2017, it dealt a serious blow to consumers’ rights. Consumers are nearly universally precluded from joining class action claims against large financial institutions due to the widespread and largely unfettered use of class-action waivers in arbitration agreements. This Note argues that class-action waivers should be regulated to ensure that individuals with inferior bargaining power and legal resources are not subjected to poor treatment at the hands of their

Files

File nameDate UploadedVisibilityFile size
03_koch_A1b.pdf
6 Sep 2022
Public
686 kB

Metrics

Metadata

  • Subject
    • Banking and Finance Law

    • Consumer Protection Law

    • Contracts

    • Dispute Resolution and Arbitration

    • Torts

  • Journal title
    • Boston College Law Review

  • Volume
    • 60

  • Issue
    • 6

  • Pagination
    • 1605

  • Date submitted

    6 September 2022