Abstract
On April 26, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc in Dukes v. Wal-Mart, held that Rule 23 commonality and typicality existed among 1.5 million women employees of Wal-Mart claiming gender discrimination in the company’s hiring and promotion practices. This Comment addresses the commonality prong and argues that courts should be reluctant to certify a class of plaintiffs in employment cases when a company’s hiring practices are as subjective and localized as Wal-Mart’s.
Files
Metadata
- Subject
Civil Rights and Discrimination
Gender
Labor and Employment Law
- Journal title
Boston College Law Review
- Volume
52
- Issue
6
- Pagination
E. Supp. 149
- Date submitted
7 September 2022