Abstract
This Note compares two medical-malpractice reforms: enterprise liability and no-fault. The Note compares the reforms for their relative ability to compensate injured patients and deter malpractice. The Note also examines the reforms' economic and sociopolitical feasibility. The Note concludes that a no-fault medical-malpractice system would better compensate patients and deter malpractice, but enterprise liability is a more feasible reform that policymakers should pursue more aggressively.
Files
Metadata
- Subject
Medical Jurisprudence
- Journal title
Boston College Law Review
- Volume
46
- Issue
5
- Pagination
1095
- Date submitted
6 September 2022