Skip to main content
LIRA@BC Law

Abstract

On the heels of their ubiquitous and controversial decision in Harvard College v. Canada (Commissioner of Patents) (the so-called ‘Harvard Mouse’ case), the Canadian Courts were soon asked to re-consider the issues surrounding the patentability of biotechnological inventions in Monsanto v. Schmeiser. Unlike Harvard Mouse, this matter was an infringement action. At the Trial Division, the crux of the action lay with Schmeiser's alleged failure to obtain a license Monsanto's patented "Roundup Ready Canola" (a canola seed tolerant of glyphosate herbicides including Monsanto's own "Roundup"). "The infringement alleged is by the defendants using, reproducing and creating genes, cells and canola seeds and plants containing genes and cells claimed in the plaintiffs' patent, and by selling the canola seed they harvested, all without the consent or licence of the plaintiffs."

Files

File nameDate UploadedVisibilityFile size
ROUNDING_UP_PLANT_PATENTS.pdf
7 Nov 2022
Public
48.9 kB

Metrics

Metadata

  • Subject
    • Intellectual Property Law

    • Science and Technology Law

  • Journal title
    • Boston College Intellectual Property and Technology Forum

  • Volume
    • 2009

  • Pagination
    • 1-6

  • Date submitted

    7 November 2022

  • Related URL