Skip to main content
LIRA@BC Law

Abstract

Although American courts provide wide discretion for freedom of the press, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ensures that the right to privacy enjoys equal footing with freedom of expression in Europe. When navigating the grey areas between these two frequently opposing rights, the European Court of Human Rights allows private information about a public figure to be published only to the extent the information contributes to the public interest. In Axel Springer AG v. Germany, the court missed a valuable opportunity to provide a clear standard for what the public interest encompasses. Although the court seems content with deciding this issue on a case-by-case basis, the resulting ambiguity can be detrimental for both the press and the individuals on whom the press often reports.

Files

File nameDate UploadedVisibilityFile size
05_manza_A1b.pdf
8 Sep 2022
Public
174 kB

Metrics

Metadata

  • Subject
    • Communications Law

    • Comparative and Foreign Law

    • Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law

    • First Amendment

    • Human Rights Law

  • Journal title
    • Boston College International and Comparative Law Review

  • Volume
    • 36

  • Issue
    • 3

  • Pagination
    • E. Supp. 61

  • Date submitted

    8 September 2022