Skip to main content
LIRA@BC Law

Abstract

On July 9, 2013, in Brown v. United Airlines, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that the Airline Deregulation Act (“ADA”) preempted skycaps’ common law tortious interference and unjust enrichment claims. In so holding, the First Circuit articulated a two-pronged test in an attempt to provide clarity to the relationship between the savings clause and the preemption clause of the ADA. This Comment argues that the First Circuit’s two-pronged test is faithful to U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence and should serve as a model for other federal appeals courts until the Supreme Court provides additional guidance.

Files

File nameDate UploadedVisibilityFile size
02_Welsh_A1b.pdf
8 Sep 2022
Public
307 kB

Metrics

Metadata

  • Subject
    • Conflict of Laws

    • Labor and Employment Law

    • Trade Regulation

    • Transportation Law

  • Journal title
    • Boston College Law Review

  • Volume
    • 55

  • Issue
    • 6

  • Pagination
    • E. Supp. 15

  • Date submitted

    8 September 2022