Abstract
The 2011 America Invents Act sought to drastically improve the American patent system by creating new review processes for already issued patents. These processes were meant to reduce patent litigation costs and clear the field of “dubious patents,” all the while increasing certainty in the existence and scope of patent rights. Though this was not the first attempt to achieve these goals, Congress failed to heed the lessons of past reforms or fully take into account the costs associated with these new post-issuance review mechanisms. The result was a set of dubious reforms. This Article marshals empirical data and case-study based evidence to show that the newly created system is open to abuse, that such abuse occurs, and that the costs that Congress ignored are substantial.
Files
Metadata
- Subject
Administrative Law
Intellectual Property Law
Law and Economics
Legislation
Science and Technology Law
- Journal title
Boston College Law Review
- Volume
56
- Issue
3
- Pagination
881
- Date submitted
8 September 2022