Skip to main content


From the introduction:

Just as slight variations between different sources of stem cells are crucial to understanding the real policy debate over when life begins under the law, slight permutations in the federal regulations and guidelines for stem cell research can have serious ramifications for advancing the science of stem cell research and therapeutic applications. As human embryonic stem cell ("ESC") research has garnered widespread press coverage and generated enormous public controversy for over a decade, scientists and physicians have been finding generous amounts of less controversial, adult stem cells ("ASCs") in an increasingly wide array of human tissue. These discoveries promise new and urgently needed therapies for patients but also pose novel challenges for regulators. This is especially so here, where many ASC therapies are emerging from the offices of practicing physicians instead of the laboratories of university or commercial research scientists.


File nameDate UploadedVisibilityFile size
7 Sep 2022
711 kB



  • Subject
    • Administrative Law

    • Health Law and Policy

  • Journal title
    • Journal of Health & Biomedical Law,

  • Volume
    • 7

  • Pagination
    • 33-272

  • Date submitted

    7 September 2022

  • Keywords