Abstract
The traditional framework of United States private law that every first-year student learns is that contracts and torts are different realms—contracts is the realm of strict liability and torts of fault. Contracts, we learn from the writings of Justice Holmes and Judge Posner, are best viewed as options; they give parties the option to perform or pay damages. The question we ask is whether, in the real world, that is indeed how contracting parties view things. Using a dataset made up of one thousand mergers and acquisitions (M&A) contracts and thirty in-depth interviews with M&A lawyers, we find that there is at least one significant area of transactional practice that rejects the perspective that fault is irrelevant to contract breach.
Files
Metadata
- Subject
Contracts
Legal Writing and Research
Torts
- Journal title
Boston College Law Review
- Volume
62
- Issue
9
- Pagination
E.Supp. I.-32
- Date submitted
7 September 2022