Abstract
This article explores one dimension of the "closed courthouse door" approach of recent Supreme Court decisions, particularly Amnesty International v. Clapper, and contrasts its restrictive standing doctrine with the open door that has been shown to "reverse discrimination" plaintiffs.
Files
Metadata
- Subject
Civil Procedure
Civil Rights and Discrimination
- Journal title
Nevada Law Journal
- Volume
15
- Issue
3
- Pagination
1181-1202
- Date submitted
8 September 2022