Skip to main content


In February 2020, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, in Citrix Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ruled that the sale of cloud computing subscriptions was subject to state sales tax because it was a transfer of tangible personal property. This was the first time a state’s highest court decided on the taxability of cloud computing products. As the industry continues to grow at a rapid pace, states have struggled to determine how to tax it. Some states find these products to be a non-taxable service, whereas others stretch their definitions of tangible personal property to allow taxation. This Comment argues that states cannot continue to make courts improperly fit new technology into outdated law, as in Citrix Systems, Inc. States must instead take aggressive steps to amend their tax statutes to partake in the bountiful profit of cloud computing and other unavoidable innovations in technology to come.


File nameDate UploadedVisibilityFile size
7 Sep 2022
468 kB



  • Subject
    • Science and Technology Law

    • State and Local Government Law

    • Taxation-State and Local

  • Journal title
    • Boston College Law Review

  • Volume
    • 62

  • Issue
    • 9

  • Pagination
    • E.Supp. II.-165

  • Date submitted

    7 September 2022

  • Additional information