Skip to main content
LIRA@BC Law

Abstract

Aereo allowed users to stream and record broadcast television to any laptop or mobile device. Shortly after Aereo was announced, broadcasters filed for an injunction claiming Aereo was in fact a cable company, and as such needed to pay retransmission fees. The heart of broadcasters' argument focused on the definition of "performance" and "to the public" under the Transmit Clause of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S. Code section 101. Aereo contested, stating that its service was acceptable both legally and technically because it simply provided users an alternative means to access free, over-the-air broadcasts. Much of Aereo's legal argument rested on Cartoon Network LP, LLLP v. CSC Holdings, Inc. (hereinafter "Cablevision").

Files

File nameDate UploadedVisibilityFile size
AEREO-INNOVATION-OR-EXPLOIT.pdf
29 Nov 2022
Public
487 kB

Metrics

Metadata

  • Subject
    • Intellectual Property Law

    • Science and Technology Law

  • Journal title
    • Boston College Intellectual Property and Technology Forum

  • Volume
    • 2015

  • Pagination
    • 1-9

  • Date submitted

    29 November 2022

  • Related URL